The Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned the N300 million fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by detained Nigerian singer, Darlington Achakpo, popularly known as Speed Darlington, against the Inspector-General of Police (IGP). Justice Musa Liman set January 27 as the new date for hearing following a request by the IGP’s counsel, CSP Audu Garba, for additional time to review a recently filed further affidavit.

During the Monday sitting, Speed Darlington's counsel, Abubakar Marshal, informed the court that the case was set for the hearing of the substantive application. Marshal explained that while the police had filed their counter affidavit, they were served a further affidavit on Monday morning, which necessitated a brief adjournment to allow the police’s legal team to review and respond to any new issues raised.

CSP Garba, representing the IGP, emphasized the need for more time to study the affidavit to ensure a comprehensive response. Consequently, Justice Liman adjourned the matter to January 27 for the adoption of applications.

The Suit and Its Demands

The suit, filed under the representation of human rights activist Deji Adeyanju, seeks a court declaration that Speed Darlington’s arrest and detention violated his fundamental human rights as enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. The suit specifically requests the following:

A declaration that the arrest and continued detention of Speed Darlington is unlawful and unconstitutional.
An order directing the IGP to immediately release the singer unconditionally.
Alternatively, an order mandating the IGP to produce Speed Darlington in court to justify his detention and possibly grant bail.
A directive for the payment of N300 million in damages as compensation for the alleged unlawful detention.

Speed Darlington has been in detention since 2024, and his legal team argues that his continued detention is a violation of his rights.

Opinion: Upholding Human Rights in High-Profile Cases

Speed Darlington’s case underscores the ongoing tension between law enforcement and citizens’ rights in Nigeria. High-profile cases like this are critical in drawing attention to the need for transparency and adherence to constitutional provisions by law enforcement agencies.

While the police's request for more time to study the further affidavit is procedural, it raises questions about the efficiency of legal processes in ensuring swift justice. For Speed Darlington, the prolonged detention has undoubtedly amplified public sympathy and scrutiny, with many advocating for better respect for due process.

The case also serves as a reminder that no individual should be subjected to indefinite detention without clear justification. Justice delayed, as the saying goes, is justice denied. As the January 27 hearing approaches, it is hoped that the judiciary will prioritize the enforcement of fundamental human rights, ensuring that the outcome sets a precedent for future cases involving unlawful detentions.

Speed Darlington's fight for justice, supported by notable human rights advocates, is a critical moment not only for him but for countless others who may face similar circumstances. This case has the potential to redefine how law enforcement operates within the framework of fundamental rights in Nigeria.