A heated conversation has erupted between popular Nigerian singer, Timi Dakolo, and the lead pastor of Light Nation Church, Abuja, Femi Lazarus, over whether gospel artistes should charge fees to perform in churches.

Pastor Lazarus, in a viral sermon, criticized gospel musicians who demand hefty payments before ministering, claiming that a particular artiste charged $10,000 to perform at a church event. He further alleged that the invoice included extravagant demands such as a 40-man escort, first-class flight tickets, and an executive suite.

However, Timi Dakolo, known for his soulful music and deep-rooted faith, called out the pastor for failing to name the said artiste. He argued that it is unrealistic for any Nigerian gospel singer to have a 40-person entourage. Taking the debate further, Dakolo pointed out an interesting contradiction—he accused Pastor Lazarus of also charging fees for his School of Ministry, where students reportedly pay as low as $150 per person to learn about preaching and ministry.

In a thought-provoking Instagram post, Dakolo questioned the fairness of the pastor's stance:
"By your definition, if anyone charges to minister, they are not gospel artistes but performers. And by that same definition, if any preacher charges to teach and minister, are they not merchants of hope and motivational speakers too?"

Dakolo went on to highlight that Pastor Lazarus' program might have as many as 1,000 students, making it a lucrative venture. He challenged the pastor's distinction between charging for gospel music performances and charging for ministry teachings, insisting that both involve monetizing gifts freely given by God.

The Big Debate: Should Gospel Artistes Charge Fees?

This controversy raises a bigger question—should gospel musicians charge fees for their performances in churches? Some argue that gospel artistes, like any professionals, have expenses to cover, including travel, band members, and production costs. They also rely on their craft for a living, just like pastors who receive offerings, honorariums, and other benefits from their ministry.

On the other hand, critics believe that ministry should be purely about service, not business. They argue that charging large sums could limit access to the gospel and place financial burdens on churches that genuinely want to host these musicians.

Where Do We Draw the Line?

While both sides make valid points, this debate ultimately boils down to perspective. Should gospel artistes minister for free because their talent is a divine gift? Or should they be compensated for their time and resources like professionals in any other field? And if pastors can charge for leadership training, is it fair to condemn musicians for setting fees for performances?

The conversation continues, and Nigerians remain divided on the issue. What do you think? Should gospel artistes charge for their performances, or should their ministry be a free service to the church?